Tired of fluctuating neck-in-neck poll numbers? While waiting for votes to be counted, take a few minutes to consider numbers not mentioned in MSM or on Election Day.
View the raw data to identify winners in Individual Strength, Team Strength, Campaign Names Score, and Mastery Level Score.
This post reflects on the trajectory of U.S. presidents from Nixon through Trump. Take a closer look at the numerical fingerprints associated with POTUS 38 and POTUS 44. Among significant historical events, September 11, 2001 is noted for its master number correlations. Did any POTUS possibly steer the country in the wrong direction?
With global tension growing and domestic uncertainty increasing, POTUS during this time had no idea to what extent their leadership abilities would be tested. It would take nearly thirty-three years for the arrival of POTUS 33. Auspicious numbers provide reassurance during times of chaos, transition, and uncertainty.
Cleveland was the first, and as of yet only, president to serve two non-consecutive terms. He also falls nearly in the exact middle of the presidential parade. There are 21 presidents before him as POTUS 22. With POTUS 46 presently in office, there have been 22 presidents since he left office as POTUS 24. Cleveland’s numerical fingerprint is very robust. It stands out when considering the abundance of master numbers. This suggests that he was the right person at the right time to be POTUS 22.
The unpredictable parade of presidents leading up to this point could have resulted in POTUS 11 many years later or someone other than Polk. POTUS 11 accomplished more than expansion, also being known for reducing taxes, stimulating the economy, and banking reform. He viewed Manifest Destiny not as imperialism, but as a path to freedom and prosperity for the common man not just the elite bankers.
George Washington forged more than a framework for a new nation, he designed a road map into the future. He could only hope that his POTUS successors possess the knowledge, wisdom, and skills to interpret the map and navigate accordingly. More importantly, would the citizenry through successive generations not fall asleep at the wheel, and pay attention to the signs? Would they learn the secret code to identify presidential material?
Unfolding events in recent days make my prediction earlier this year of an 11th-hour switcheroo less than hypothetical. As Democrats struggle with the competence of POTUS 46 and seek alternatives, will we see the emergence of POTUS 47 sooner rather than later?
Explore possible outcomes of the 2024 election and the numerical fingerprints of potential Biden replacements, potential Trump replacements, the Republican VP nominee JD Vance, and RFK’s running mate Nicole Shanahan.
With so many unknowns, discover how we could go from POTUS 46 to 49 in a short time.
This post emphasizes the significance of master numbers and their impact on human history, urging readers to be mindful of the upcoming election’s potential outcomes and the evolution of human consciousness.
Third-party candidates serve as a wild card or Joker, to be played at the right time to thwart the competition. Presented below find the numerical fingerprints revealing POTUS potential of four such wild cards in the 2024 election.
As POTUS 45 moves closer to a rematch with POTUS 46, he could become POTUS 47. The only other time this occurred in US history, a president serving two non-consecutive terms, was Grover Cleveland (POTUS 22 and POTUS 24).
Is history repeating itself with the possibility of another non-consecutive double POTUS with numerical significance?
As an exercise in WHAT IF, peruse the results of my research on former Republican candidates. Several of them have been mentioned as possible running mates if Trump is, indeed, the nominee. If anything goes south with the Trump campaign, someone might need to step in. A closer look indicates who among them possesses POTUS potential based on master numbers appearing in their numerical fingerprint.
Voters may long for a fresh new direction rather than stagnant or backward, more of the same.
Instead of relying on poll numbers that can be manipulated and misinterpreted, I demonstrate how to identify POTUS potential based on a name and birthdate, numbers that usually remain constant and reliable.
This post presents the raw data found in the numerical fingerprints of Democrats, and you can decide for yourself. This includes leading hangers-on, as well as some candidates who have since dropped out of the race. Perhaps some of them would make a good VP or future POTUS.
Sensible leadership without the endless extremes could be a reality rather than a far-fetched idea. Maybe it’s time for a third option. Time to re-imagine an outdated way of doing things in a new way, it’s Third-Party Time! The only thing preventing a Third-Party from winning a general election for president is enough people voting for them.
In anticipation of Joe Biden’s announcement, many people are asking “Who is Biden going to choose as his running mate?” The question that follows is often “Will she be Black or White?” Since I don’t have a functioning crystal ball, I rely on a tried and true technique.
Short of being Biden’s running mate and his early demise, the only hope these POTUS Potentials have is to run in 2024 or 2028. If so, better luck next time. Who among them presents a numerical fingerprint worthy of being POTUS? Who among them should continue their pursuit, and who should give it up already? The poll numbers and the media may say one thing. Their numerical fingerprints reveal something more reliable and not subject to manipulation and margins of error — their true nature and potential.
This POTUS Potential shares something with Vice-President Pence featured in the previous post. The Senator from Delaware also lost his bid for the presidency to someone with less experience in politics and was chosen as a running mate.
With so much attention being focused on the Democratic Party debates and campaigns for the past six months, many people overlooked the obvious. Someone not even running for office has a better chance of becoming POTUS 46 than any of the candidates who spent hundreds of millions of dollars on failed campaigns.
POTUS CODE 